# automatic-ripping-machine vs Owncast

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Owncast |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 4 in Live Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 5 391 | 11 632 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 ✓ | +76 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.3.0 · 2 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Owncast scores 73/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Owncast.

If you want the quickest setup, Owncast is easier to run; automatic-ripping-machine needs more configuration.

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Owncast](https://selfhost.directory/project/owncast) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/owncast.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-owncast