# automatic-ripping-machine vs Orca

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Orca |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 91/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 109 581 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +9 674 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

Orca ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.

If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; automatic-ripping-machine needs more configuration.

Orca is growing faster right now (+9 674 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-orca