# automatic-ripping-machine vs opencut

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | opencut |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 12 in Video |
| GitHub stars | 5 389 | 96 654 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +6 099 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 ✓ | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

opencut scores 75/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for opencut.

opencut is growing faster right now (+6 099 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [opencut](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-opencut