# automatic-ripping-machine vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 5 391 | 393 312 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 | +2 888 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 888 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-openclaw