# automatic-ripping-machine vs Onlook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Onlook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 6 in Web Development |
| GitHub stars | 5 389 | 27 025 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 ✓ | +53 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Onlook scores 69/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Onlook.

If you want the quickest setup, automatic-ripping-machine is easier to run; Onlook needs more configuration.

automatic-ripping-machine is growing faster right now (+148 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Onlook](https://selfhost.directory/project/onlook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/onlook.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-onlook