# automatic-ripping-machine vs OmniTools

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | OmniTools |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 72/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #13 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 10 515 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +268 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniTools scores 72/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OmniTools.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; automatic-ripping-machine needs more configuration.

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [OmniTools](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-omnitools