# automatic-ripping-machine vs Ollama

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Ollama |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 95/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 5 391 | 185 157 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 | +3 504 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 51 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v0.40.13 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Ollama scores 95/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

Ollama ships more often: 51 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.

If you want the quickest setup, Ollama is easier to run; automatic-ripping-machine needs more configuration.

Ollama is growing faster right now (+3 504 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Ollama](https://selfhost.directory/project/ollama) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ollama.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-ollama