# automatic-ripping-machine vs NodeBB

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | NodeBB |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #4 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 5 391 | 15 244 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 ✓ | +19 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v4.16.5 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

NodeBB scores 73/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

NodeBB ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.

automatic-ripping-machine is growing faster right now (+147 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [NodeBB](https://selfhost.directory/project/nodebb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nodebb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-nodebb