# automatic-ripping-machine vs MediaMTX

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | MediaMTX |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #3 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 5 391 | 20 539 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 | +287 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v1.21.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

MediaMTX scores 79/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

MediaMTX ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.

If you want the quickest setup, MediaMTX is easier to run; automatic-ripping-machine needs more configuration.

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [MediaMTX](https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mediamtx.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-mediamtx