# automatic-ripping-machine vs Libation

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Libation |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 68/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 391 | 6 376 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 | +155 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Libation scores 68/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Libation](https://selfhost.directory/project/libation) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/libation.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-libation