# automatic-ripping-machine vs Koma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Koma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #15 of 18 in Video Processing |
| GitHub stars | 5 389 ✓ | 298 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

automatic-ripping-machine scores 67/100 against 41/100 for Koma, so it is the safer default.

automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Koma.

If you want the quickest setup, automatic-ripping-machine is easier to run; Koma needs more configuration.

automatic-ripping-machine is growing faster right now (+148 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Koma](https://selfhost.directory/project/koma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/koma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-koma