# automatic-ripping-machine vs Duix.Avatar

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Duix.Avatar |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 68/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #20 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 5 389 | 16 121 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 ✓ | +124 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

Duix.Avatar scores 68/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Duix.Avatar.

If you want the quickest setup, automatic-ripping-machine is easier to run; Duix.Avatar needs more configuration.

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Duix.Avatar](https://selfhost.directory/project/duix-avatar) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/duix-avatar.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-duix-avatar