# automatic-ripping-machine vs Discourse

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | Discourse |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 5 391 | 48 027 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 ✓ | +131 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 ✓ | _gh-attach-assets · 15 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Discourse scores 83/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.

automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Discourse.

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [Discourse](https://selfhost.directory/project/discourse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/discourse.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Discourse vs Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-rocketchat)
- [Discourse vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-zulip)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-discourse