# automatic-ripping-machine vs ClipForge

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | automatic-ripping-machine | ClipForge |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #4 of 18 in Video Processing |
| GitHub stars | 5 389 ✓ | 1 117 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v0.9.12 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

automatic-ripping-machine scores 67/100 against 57/100 for ClipForge, so it is the safer default.

automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for ClipForge.

automatic-ripping-machine is growing faster right now (+148 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [automatic-ripping-machine](https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/automatic-ripping-machine.md)
- [ClipForge](https://selfhost.directory/project/clipforge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/clipforge.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/automatic-ripping-machine-vs-clipforge