# AutoGPT vs UmlautAdaptarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | UmlautAdaptarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #120 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 187 812 ✓ | 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +275 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.6 · 5 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | — |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 40/100 for UmlautAdaptarr, so it is the safer default.

UmlautAdaptarr ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.

If you want the quickest setup, UmlautAdaptarr is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+275 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [UmlautAdaptarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/umlautadaptarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umlautadaptarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-umlautadaptarr