# AutoGPT vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted [AI Agents projects](https://selfhost.directory/ai-agents), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 187 802 ✓ | 117 613 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +286 | +5 254 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 85/100 for AutoGPT, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 254 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-tradingagents