# AutoGPT vs textsnap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | textsnap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #8 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 187 808 ✓ | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +271 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.

textsnap ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.

If you want the quickest setup, textsnap is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+271 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [textsnap](https://selfhost.directory/project/textsnap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/textsnap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-textsnap