# AutoGPT vs seatsurfing

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | seatsurfing |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking |
| GitHub stars | 187 808 ✓ | 315 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +271 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.138.2 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 53/100 for seatsurfing, so it is the safer default.

seatsurfing ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.

If you want the quickest setup, seatsurfing is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+271 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [seatsurfing](https://selfhost.directory/project/seatsurfing) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seatsurfing.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-seatsurfing