# AutoGPT vs SandBase Harness

> Two self-hosted [AI Agents projects](https://selfhost.directory/ai-agents), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | SandBase Harness |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #170 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 187 805 ✓ | 636 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +289 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.3.8 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 39/100 for SandBase Harness, so it is the safer default.

SandBase Harness ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.

If you want the quickest setup, SandBase Harness is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+289 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [SandBase Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sandbase-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sandbase-harness.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-sandbase-harness