# AutoGPT vs rss-reader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | rss-reader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 187 805 ✓ | 438 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +268 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 47/100 for rss-reader, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, rss-reader is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+268 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [rss-reader](https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-reader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-reader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-rss-reader