# AutoGPT vs RSS Guard

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | RSS Guard |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 187 803 ✓ | 2 816 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +287 ✓ | +55 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 5.2.5 · 20 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 64/100 for RSS Guard, so it is the safer default.

RSS Guard ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.

If you want the quickest setup, RSS Guard is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [RSS Guard](https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-guard) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-guard.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-rss-guard