# AutoGPT vs retroassembly

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | retroassembly |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 187 810 ✓ | 1 153 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 ✓ | +72 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.

retroassembly ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.

If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+273 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-retroassembly