# AutoGPT vs recyclarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | recyclarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #15 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 187 805 ✓ | 2 146 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +268 ✓ | +27 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v8.8.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C# |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 64/100 for recyclarr, so it is the safer default.

recyclarr ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.

If you want the quickest setup, recyclarr is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+268 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [recyclarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/recyclarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/recyclarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-recyclarr