# AutoGPT vs R2R

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | R2R |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 187 805 ✓ | 8 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +268 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, R2R is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+268 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [R2R](https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-r2r