# AutoGPT vs Qinglong

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | Qinglong |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 187 810 ✓ | 20 027 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 ✓ | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 69/100 for Qinglong, so it is the safer default.

Qinglong ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.

If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+273 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [Qinglong](https://selfhost.directory/project/qinglong) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qinglong.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-qinglong