# AutoGPT vs pocketpaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | pocketpaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #52 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 187 804 ✓ | 894 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +288 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.4.18 · 29 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 48/100 for pocketpaw, so it is the safer default.

pocketpaw ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.

If you want the quickest setup, pocketpaw is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [pocketpaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/pocketpaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pocketpaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-pocketpaw