# AutoGPT vs Playerr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | Playerr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #17 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 187 803 ✓ | 180 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +287 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.4.8 · 3 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 45/100 for Playerr, so it is the safer default.

Playerr ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.

If you want the quickest setup, Playerr is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [Playerr](https://selfhost.directory/project/playerr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/playerr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-playerr