# AutoGPT vs pellicola

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | pellicola |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #16 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 187 811 ✓ | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +274 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 45/100 for pellicola, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, pellicola is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+274 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [pellicola](https://selfhost.directory/project/pellicola) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pellicola.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-pellicola