# AutoGPT vs nzbhydra2

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | nzbhydra2 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 6 in Feed Aggregator |
| GitHub stars | 187 807 ✓ | 1 742 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +270 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 23 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v9.2.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 60/100 for nzbhydra2, so it is the safer default.

nzbhydra2 ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.

If you want the quickest setup, nzbhydra2 is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+270 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [nzbhydra2](https://selfhost.directory/project/nzbhydra2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nzbhydra2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-nzbhydra2