# AutoGPT vs nati.ve

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | nati.ve |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #21 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 187 807 ✓ | 727 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +270 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Kotlin |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 48/100 for nati.ve, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, nati.ve is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+270 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [nati.ve](https://selfhost.directory/project/native) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/native.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-native