# AutoGPT vs metamcp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | metamcp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #10 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 187 807 ✓ | 2 735 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +270 ✓ | +49 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.

metamcp ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.

If you want the quickest setup, metamcp is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+270 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [metamcp](https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/metamcp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-metamcp