# AutoGPT vs GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AutoGPT | GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #6 of 8 in Data Pipeline |
| GitHub stars | 187 803 ✓ | 503 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +287 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.2.0 · 22 May 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 53/100 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, so it is the safer default.

GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.

AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AutoGPT](https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autogpt.md)
- [GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL](https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse-etl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/clickhouse-etl.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autogpt-vs-clickhouse-etl