# autobrr vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | autobrr | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 45 in Download Management | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 3 185 | 17 185 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +97 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.89.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 68/100 for autobrr, so it is the safer default.

autobrr ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; autobrr needs more configuration.

autobrr is growing faster right now (+97 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [autobrr](https://selfhost.directory/project/autobrr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autobrr.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autobrr-vs-upptime