# autobrr vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | autobrr | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 45 in Download Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 3 185 | 95 319 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +97 | +2 357 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.89.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 68/100 for autobrr, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for autobrr.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 357 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [autobrr](https://selfhost.directory/project/autobrr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autobrr.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autobrr-vs-stirling-pdf