# autobrr vs Orca

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | autobrr | Orca |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 91/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 45 in Download Management | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 3 184 | 109 581 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +96 | +9 674 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v1.89.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Orca scores 91/100 against 68/100 for autobrr, so it is the safer default.

autobrr ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Orca.

If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; autobrr needs more configuration.

Orca is growing faster right now (+9 674 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [autobrr](https://selfhost.directory/project/autobrr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autobrr.md)
- [Orca](https://selfhost.directory/project/orca) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/orca.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autobrr-vs-orca