# autobrr vs openclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | autobrr | openclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #8 of 45 in Download Management | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 3 183 | 393 295 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +2 947 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 37 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.89.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 68/100 for autobrr, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for autobrr.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 947 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [autobrr](https://selfhost.directory/project/autobrr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autobrr.md)
- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autobrr-vs-openclaw