# autobrr vs Flood

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | autobrr | Flood |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 45 in Download Management | #2 of 7 in Torrent |
| GitHub stars | 3 183 ✓ | 2 860 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 ✓ | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v1.89.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.16.3 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

autobrr scores 68/100 against 65/100 for Flood, so it is the safer default.

autobrr ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Flood.

If you want the quickest setup, Flood is easier to run; autobrr needs more configuration.

autobrr is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [autobrr](https://selfhost.directory/project/autobrr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/autobrr.md)
- [Flood](https://selfhost.directory/project/flood) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/flood.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/autobrr-vs-flood