# AudioMuse-AI vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AudioMuse-AI | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 59 in Music Streaming | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 2 826 | 8 654 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +183 ✓ | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v3.6.4 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

AudioMuse-AI scores 67/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

AudioMuse-AI ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; AudioMuse-AI needs more configuration.

## Details

- [AudioMuse-AI](https://selfhost.directory/project/audiomuse-ai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/audiomuse-ai.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/audiomuse-ai-vs-workout-cool