# AudioMuse-AI vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AudioMuse-AI | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 59 in Music Streaming | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 2 826 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +183 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.6.4 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

AudioMuse-AI scores 67/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

AudioMuse-AI ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, AudioMuse-AI is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

AudioMuse-AI is growing faster right now (+183 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AudioMuse-AI](https://selfhost.directory/project/audiomuse-ai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/audiomuse-ai.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/audiomuse-ai-vs-windows-arm