# AudioMuse-AI vs WhisperLive---CPU

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | AudioMuse-AI | WhisperLive---CPU |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 2 820 | 4 337 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +183 ✓ | +45 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v3.6.4 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

AudioMuse-AI scores 67/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.

AudioMuse-AI ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.

AudioMuse-AI is growing faster right now (+183 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [AudioMuse-AI](https://selfhost.directory/project/audiomuse-ai) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/audiomuse-ai.md)
- [WhisperLive---CPU](https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/audiomuse-ai-vs-whisperlive-cpu