Audiobookshelfvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Audiobookshelf | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 838 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +418 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
Audiobookshelf ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+418 stars in 30 days).
Audiobookshelf details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep Audiobookshelf, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with