# Audiobookshelf vs Winter CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Audiobookshelf | Winter CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 839 ✓ | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +402 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.

Audiobookshelf ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.

If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; Winter CMS needs more configuration.

Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+402 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Audiobookshelf](https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf.md)
- [Winter CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/winter-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/winter-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/audiobookshelf-vs-winter-cms