Audiobookshelfvsporta
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Audiobookshelf | porta | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #122 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 14 839 | 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +402 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 17 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.16.2 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 42/100 for porta, so it is the safer default.
porta ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Audiobookshelf.
If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; porta needs more configuration.
Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+402 stars in 30 days).
Audiobookshelf details →porta details →
Swap a project
Keep Audiobookshelf, compare it with
Keep porta, compare it with