# Audiobookshelf vs Otari

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Audiobookshelf | Otari |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #14 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 14 837 ✓ | 749 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +417 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.33.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 56/100 for Otari, so it is the safer default.

Audiobookshelf ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Otari.

If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; Otari needs more configuration.

Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+417 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Audiobookshelf](https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf.md)
- [Otari](https://selfhost.directory/project/otari) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/otari.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/audiobookshelf-vs-otari