# Audiobookshelf vs Operant

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Audiobookshelf | Operant |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #170 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 14 839 ✓ | 447 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +419 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | desktop-candidate-2026-09-28-08e65ea · 28 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 39/100 for Operant, so it is the safer default.

Audiobookshelf ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Operant.

If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; Operant needs more configuration.

Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+419 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Audiobookshelf](https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf.md)
- [Operant](https://selfhost.directory/project/operant) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/operant.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/audiobookshelf-vs-operant