# Audiobookshelf vs Open Data Capture

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Audiobookshelf | Open Data Capture |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #3 of 3 in Data Collection |
| GitHub stars | 14 846 ✓ | 119 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +409 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.2 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 47/100 for Open Data Capture, so it is the safer default.

Audiobookshelf ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Open Data Capture.

If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; Open Data Capture needs more configuration.

Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+409 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Audiobookshelf](https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf.md)
- [Open Data Capture](https://selfhost.directory/project/opendatacapture) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opendatacapture.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/audiobookshelf-vs-opendatacapture