AudiobookshelfvsOpen Data Capture
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Audiobookshelf | Open Data Capture | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #3 of 3 in Data Collection |
| GitHub stars | 14 843 | 119 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +406 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v2.5.2 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 47/100 for Open Data Capture, so it is the safer default.
Audiobookshelf ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Open Data Capture.
If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; Open Data Capture needs more configuration.
Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+406 stars in 30 days).
Audiobookshelf details →Open Data Capture details →
Swap a project
Keep Audiobookshelf, compare it with
Keep Open Data Capture, compare it with