# Audiobookshelf vs Omoide

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Audiobookshelf | Omoide |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #37 of 41 in Photo Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 837 ✓ | 277 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +417 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.7.6 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 40/100 for Omoide, so it is the safer default.

Omoide ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Audiobookshelf.

If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; Omoide needs more configuration.

Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+417 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Audiobookshelf](https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf.md)
- [Omoide](https://selfhost.directory/project/omoide) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omoide.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/audiobookshelf-vs-omoide