# Audiobookshelf vs o-spreadsheet

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Audiobookshelf | o-spreadsheet |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #10 of 10 in Data Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 845 ✓ | 297 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +408 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 14 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | 20.0.5 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 49/100 for o-spreadsheet, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; o-spreadsheet needs more configuration.

Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+408 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Audiobookshelf](https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf.md)
- [o-spreadsheet](https://selfhost.directory/project/o-spreadsheet) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/o-spreadsheet.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/audiobookshelf-vs-o-spreadsheet