# Audiobookshelf vs Kitana

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Audiobookshelf | Kitana |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #78 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 14 830 ✓ | 531 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +410 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | SCSS |

## Which one should you pick?

Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 46/100 for Kitana, so it is the safer default.

Audiobookshelf ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Kitana.

If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; Kitana needs more configuration.

Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+410 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Audiobookshelf](https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/audiobookshelf.md)
- [Kitana](https://selfhost.directory/project/kitana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kitana.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/audiobookshelf-vs-kitana